Crimes of Heart, Odor and Perception

July 8th, 2010

0
Heat waves passing over the city are often followed by attendant waves of crime. At least, this is the theory over at The Brooklyn Paper, which wonders whether McCarren Park in Greenpoint/Williamsburg is experiencing a bit of the latter after a string of recent incidents, including a rape, a shooting and several robberies. Uptown, the Columbia University community is similarly on edge after an assault in Riverside Park on Monday.

Elsewhere on the crime beat, The Brooklyn Paper also reports an case of cigarette theft on Hoyt Street as robbers snatched 30 cartons of Newports from the back of a delivery van before peeling out in their car. With new taxes pushing the price of cigarettes higher than anywhere else in the country, could such crimes be on the rise?

Other minor crime news: a man was mugged at knife point while putting on cologne just before rush hour in a downtown Brooklyn phone booth, the Brooklyn Heights Blog reports. The thief made off with $25, but left the unidentified scent. This is a wise crook; a distinctive eau de toilette can only help the police track you down. (Have there ever been smell line-ups?)

Of course, as my colleague Manny Fernandez reports Wednesday, the fetid stench of garbage slow-cooking in the heat would mask any trace of personal scent in a generalized cloud of odor.

Keeping rats at bay among such foul plenty is another challenge, but one garbage bag entrepreneur believes the solution may be in dousing bags with the sweet smell of mint.

“It don’t smell like a rose garden, but it’s much more pleasant than before,”  an Upper East Side building manager, told DNA Info. The New York City Housing Authority has had no such luck, DNA Info notes: “It’s been testing the bags on a pilot basis at the Pink House development in Brooklyn, but staff there have noticed no difference. Rodents eat straight through the bags just like any other, spokeswoman Myriam Ayala said.”

In other examples of things that seemingly refuse to go away: “The Daily Show,” like other late-night programs, continues to be plagued by claims that it is a sexist place to work. Timed to the appearance of a new woman on-air personality, Olivia Munn, a late June post on Jezebel set off the most recent debate, with several former female staffers chiming in, both on and off the record. As one anonymous veteran put it: “Any sort of emotional vulnerability is like blood to a shark. And that is not great for women.” Emily Gould, a former Gawker writer, gave her counter-intuitive thoughts about the conflict — “righteously indignant rage but which is actually just petty jealousy, cleverly marketed as feminism” — on Slate on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, the women who work on the show, which is based in Manhattan, issued a rebuttal. “’The Daily Show’ isn’t a place where women quietly suffer on the sidelines as barely tolerated tokens. On the contrary: just like the men here, we’re indispensable,” the statement read, in part. So surely that’s the end of that.

For anyone interested in seeing Ms. Munn in person, My Upper West points to her appearance at Borders on Columbus Circle on Wednesday night. She is, of course, promoting a new book.

So maybe the controversy will continue? As Ms. Gould explains, it’s all good for the bottom line.

Discovery Inside Grocery Bags

July 7th, 2010

0
There’s no way to know what’s really in your “eco-friendly” grocery bag, unless its tested.

First we told you how those bags can contaminate the food going on your table. Now News 3 takes a closer look at your reusable grocery bags by getting them tested right here in College Station.

Dr. Suresh Pillai is a professor of microbiology at Texas A&M University. “Understanding the level of organisms in these bags is…trying to understand what is the exposure of humans to these organisms,” he explained.

A study in June found 97% of people using reusable grocery bags, weren’t cleaning them, and ended up exposing themselves to food-borne bacteria inside the bags. The methods used in that study are being recreated at a lab at Texas A&M University to randomly test 3 reusable shopping bags.

The lab techs are looking for “indicator organisms” most commonly found in feces. Dr. Pillai said, “These would be organisms that are indicative of fecal contamination…E. coli, entro cocci, coliforms.”

Graduate student David Prince shows how they test for contamination, using ultraviolet light. “This is one that we spiked with entro cocci and it showed that it was positive. This is bag A, here we can see…three pouches fluorescing and the other two bags were negative,” Prince explained.

Doctoral student, Chandni Nair, explained what the results mean. “Bag A it is contaminated. Bag B, contamination is there, but slightly less than bag A…bag C…no contamination,” Nair said. This means bag A is most likely affected with fecal contamination.

Amy McGee said, “It’s pretty gross.”

Remember Johnathon Carrizales? He admits he still hasn’t washed his bags since we last spoke to him for the first part of our story. “I did not think it was going to be that bad…I don’t know if I’ll use them anymore,” said Carrizales.

Some shoppers though, still prefer their reusable bags. “I bet you could find that in the plastic bags too, so I prefer to use them still,” McGee admitted.

Bill Bailey said, “You go anywhere you’ll find all kinds of contaminants.”

But if those contaminants are in your food they can lead to a wide variety of health concerns, even death. It’s something completely avoidable with a little soap and water.

Gibson & Tiffany Catfight for Syfy

July 5th, 2010

0
Does Mega Python VS. Gatoroid sound like the cheesiest movie EVER? Not if you are an agent for Debbie Gibson or Tiffany.

The two ’80s pop queens are about to duke it out for the Syfy original movie, Mega Python VS. Gatoroid.

See if you can follow this one: Gibson is a goofy animal rights advocate who wants to save some illegally imported snakes. She sets them free into the Everglades, where they become ginormous. Tiffany is equally as wacky about the alligators.

Although it’s their first film together, both have worked on previous Syfy projects. Tiffany was part of Mega Piranha, while Gibson starred in Mega Shark Vs Giant Octopus.

“I know that pop culture fanatics have been dying for Tiffany and me to collaborate for the past 24 years,” says Gibson. “What better way to do it than by battling each other in a campy romp through the Everglades?”

We shall see, Deborah/Debbie. Mega Python VS. Gatoroid will start filming this month. The network says it should air sometime in 2011.

Op shops clean up

July 4th, 2010

0
Here’s the truth about fashion: It changes quickly. So what do you do when you’re stuck with a closet full of barely worn shirts, dresses and shoes?

Starting in September, New York City will launch one of the largest textile recycling initiatives in the nation. The aim is to make it easy to donate clothing, almost as easy as throwing it away.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, Americans pitch almost 10 pounds of socks, jeans, shirts and sheets per year, per person. In New York, where 190,000 tons of textiles entered the city’s landfills in 2008 alone, the plan would place 50 collection bins in high-traffic areas.

“I moved three times in the last five years, and each time I ended up throwing away clothes,” says 25-year-old Tracy Feldman. “It is just too hard to haul it all over the city. If there was a bin on my block, I wouldn’t hesitate to recycle them.”

The city is taking bids for a 10- to 15-year contract with a nonprofit company that will be responsible for the bins. Goodwill Industries International is one of the companies bidding on the contract.

“There has not been another program like this that we know of,” said Goodwill spokesman Alfred Vanderbilt. “We think they are being very creative and we hope this sets a new standard.”

A Goodwill Industries survey of 600 adults in the United States and Canada found that more than half of people who donate clothing say they wouldn’t go more than 10 minutes out of their way to make a donation.

Robert Lange, the director of the Bureau of Waste Prevention, Reuse and Recycling in New York, said his department discovered the same problem.

“You can open a black bag at the landfill and see what looks like new clothing,” he said. “It is easier to throw it out than recycle.”

Not all used clothing can be recycled into usable clothing – take those old, stinky sneakers and torn clothing. But that doesn’t mean those items can’t be donated. While Goodwill is mostly looking for clothing that can be resold, there are ways to recycle even the old tattered pieces.

At Wearable Collections, a New Jersey-based textile recycling company, almost half of donations are good for resale, according to the owner. The other half is split nearly evenly between being used for rags for businesses like the automotive industry and being broken down for insulation. Less than 5 per cent of the total is unusable and goes to the landfill.

Officials say that if New York’s campaign is successful, it could lead to a nationwide movement to recycle clothing.

Not only would that clear up some room in the nation’s landfills, it could also create jobs, said Brenda Platt, co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance based in Washington, DC. She profiled 20 textile recycling companies and estimates that the industry creates 85 times more jobs than landfills.

Wearable Collections has been offering free bins to apartment buildings and dorm rooms throughout the East Coast for the last few years. The company’s employees collect the bins as often as once a week, and tenants never have to go farther than their lobby to get rid of old clothing.

Adam Baruchowitz, the owner of Wearable Collections, is enthusiastic about city governments and charities working together. “I think it is going to raise the consciousness of textile recycling, which is a good thing for us,” Baruchowitz said.

And if all goes as planned, New York may be just the beginning.

“If this is as effective as it can be, it will influence other locations,” Lange said. “We will be leading by example.”

Crochet – it’s a design for life

July 2nd, 2010

0
In a budget week that has seen the country united, or otherwise unhappily welded, in austerity, one would feel safe to assume that uniquely rendered, artisanal objets d’art may not head its shopping lists. Not so. On Tuesday, while George Osborne was perfecting his “this hurts me more than it hurts you” face, another economically anxious audience was receiving more cheering news. At Assemble 2010, the Craft Council’s annual conference, research was launched showing that – despite a recession – the craft market has been attracting more buyers and enjoying a stronger commercial image than ever before.

The reasons for this blooming are fairly self-evident. The ubiquity of similarly conceived, only differently branded, goods has powered a craving for authenticity. Add to this an increasing disillusionment with companies who would rather we concerned ourselves with the lifestyle a product signals, rather than its inherent quality or purpose. A growing environmental awareness means that purchasing decisions are now more weighted according to sustainability and local sourcing. Likewise, the resurgence of interest in acquiring skills that are more hand than head – be that knitting a jumper or planting an allotment – inevitably steers trade: 21% of people who had bought craft had themselves taken part in a craft activity six or more times in the past 12 months. The same surely can’t be said of shoppers at Ikea, unless craft activity includes assembling a flat-pack Billy bookcase – and doing so six times a year would send a body round the bend.

Those of a sunnier disposition can read this as evidence of a population’s nascent attempts to redefine their consumer activity for an – allegedly imminent – post-consumerist era. Though one speaker noted that the luxury goods market, flagging in the downturn, has been frantically appropriating the operative language of craft, with Louis Vuitton, for example, introducing in-store ateliers that offer customers some handmade with their handbag.

For the cynics who consider this to be the same old binge-spending at a different checkout, and those who point out that contemplating a non-essential purchase will be an impossibility for many after a VAT hike, it’s worth then considering some fresh qualitative research from the Craft Council, which assesses the social contribution made by makers. Some 70% of makers now practice portfolio working, which means that they are sometime employed in community and educational settings as well as creating.

One project encapsulates this social subsidy. The Xtravert programme in Cornwall is run by a group of furniture designers who teach carpentry to young people not in education, employment or training. (How ironic that, as the country anticipates mass youth unemployment, the term Neets – previously used to shame the feckless teens of Vicky Pollard parody – will soon come to define a whole generation.) Now developing into a financially self-sustaining business, making furniture and sheds to order, the initial draw for this notoriously attendance-phobic group was that – all keen skaters – they could learn how to fashion their own skate ramps. Concepts such as discipline, work ethic and personal utility took on an immediate meaning: if the wooden boards weren’t flush then it was your own wheels that would stall.

Hello world!

July 2nd, 2010

0
Welcome to Free Blog Hosting @ Blogetery.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Check out our new tutorial section full of helpful text and short video guides that explain different elements of using Blogetery.